Skip to main content

What are the benefits to conducting a trade mark search?

 here are several benefits to searching trademark registries before creating a trademark.


Avoiding Infringement: Conducting a thorough search of trademark registries can help identify any existing trademarks that are similar to the proposed trademark. This can prevent the business from inadvertently choosing a trademark that infringes on the rights of another party, which can lead to costly legal disputes and the need to rebrand.


Saving Time and Money: Conducting a search before creating a trademark can save a business time and money by identifying potential issues early on. If a proposed trademark is already in use or too similar to an existing trademark, the business can avoid the expense of creating a new brand and potentially having to change it later.


Increasing the likelihood of registration: By searching the registries, businesses can also identify any potential issues that may prevent the registration of their proposed trademark. This can allow them to make changes to the proposed trademark to increase the chances of registration.


Identifying potential competitors: Searching the registries can also reveal any other businesses that are using similar trademarks, which can provide valuable information about potential competition.


Identifying the strength of existing trademarks: Through the search, businesses can also determine the strength of existing trademarks by looking at their registration date, usage, and the goods and services they are associated with.


Overall, searching trademark registries before creating a trademark can help businesses avoid infringement, save time and money, increase the likelihood of registration, identify potential competitors and understand the strength of existing trademarks. This can help businesses make more informed decisions about their branding and trademark strategy.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Misappropriation of likeness, it's in the game

Misappropriation of likeness, it's in the game With the recent announcement that EA will be venturing back into the world of college sports for one of their upcoming games. It is essential to look at the reasons for its (over a decade-long) hiatus from making college sports games. Several high-profile cases took down a very profitable area of sports gaming almost ten years ago, over a simple but crucial element to the games, the players.  Privacy and personality laws in the United States is an emerging area of law founded on the basis that is based in tort law. It deals with the ideas that a person has rights: 1. To be left alone; 2. To not have public disclosure of private facts; 3. To not be depicted in a false light; and 4. To not have your name and likeness misappropriated.  On these critical tenets, personality laws have become increasingly more prevalent as, due to advances in technologies, it is becoming easier for one's likeness to be copied and distributed.  Th

NEVER Read the Comments!

The Federal Court this week delivered their judgement on  Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Service Seeking Pty Ltd  [2020] FCA 1040 going all out by handing out whopping fines, legal costs orders and ordering Service Seeking Pty Ltd to establish a, undoubtedly expensive, compliance system to be monitored by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC).  What did they do that was so bad?  According to the Federal Court of Australia, they created a system in which businesses could write their own customer reviews.  With a rating system less defined than what constitutes a 5-star rating in an Uber trip, businesses could write a review, assign a star rating and send it off to their customer for approval. If the customer didn’t respond or even open the email containing the review, then the review was automatically published online after a set period. By estimates of the Court, approximately 80% of the reviews published on the website for the period that this sch

You can take the bread company out of Hawaii, but you can't take Hawaii out of the bread company.

You can take the bread company out of Hawaii, but you can't take Hawaii out of the bread company. What do you do when your favourite company that makes your favourite type of bread makes it bread outside of your favourite state? You take them to court, or at least that is what one man has done.  A man in New York has filed a class action against bread maker, King's Hawaiian over the sweet rolls alleging that the company misled him into believing that the rolls are actually made in Hawaii. Robert Galinsky is pursuing a class-action lawsuit against the company claiming unjust enrichment, negligent misrepresentation, and fraud. King's Hawaiian packaging Galinsky claims that Hawaiian Rolls by itself "does not denote a roll made in Hawaii any more than a 'Moon Pie' can claim to have been baked on the moon." But the company using the original location of its factory, 'Hilo, Hawaii' in its packaging is misleading to customers.  If Galinsky can convince th