Skip to main content

Inflation is Crippling

Inflation

 


Inflation


Inflation is one of those tricky things to comprehend; why is the same milk that I bought yesterday for $2 now costing me $2.50? It's the same milk that was in the store; nothing has been improved about this milk, it hasn't become cheese, deliciously creamy cheese... no, nothing has been changed, so what happened?


From what I gathered from every news program attempting to explain it, inflation is caused by either an increase in demand or a decrease in supply, so either more people want to buy something, or there is less of it to sell. And that's it, those are the two main reasons, so when people blame other circumstances, if they cannot link it to either of those reasons, they are likely just making things up.


I get really annoyed when people with platforms will use inflation as a reason to further their own policies; maybe it's the millennials not investing enough, perhaps it's superannuation funds, maybe its too many tourists or too few; one of the most annoying things for me is hearing people blame these other reasons because I would be shocked if they actually care about inflation or if they have a legitimate reason to linkt the two.


Because it is a very serious situation, inflation is a killer. It threatens a lot of stability in the economy and regular people's lives. An average person can be put so far behind simply from not keeping up with inflation. Many more people, including maybe even you, are struggling to buy the day-to-day groceries they purchased earlier this year. The standard of living is dropping at the same time the cost of living is rising. AND WHAT CAN BE DONE? Is it the government that needs to fix this? Is the responsibility just on the regular person to somehow find more money to buy the basic staples? And by this, I am not referring to the newest sports can but things like sliced bread and cheese.  


So as it has been explained to me, the simple theory is that governments try to limit a yearly inflation rate to as small an amount as possible and that wages will bump up a little bit ahead of it. But that isn't happening and that, in my opinion, is why this new inflation crisis is so dangerous.


Overall, people are worse off than their counterparts ten years ago, less paid, more in debt, and overworked; it seems to be, by most measurable factors, times are tougher, and we need to appreciate this. We need to understand that inflation will hit harder than it would normally have because of this. I heard an interesting thing about inflation in Belgium, and both the public and private workforces have their salaries pegged to inflation. As a result, workers are looking at a 12% increase in wages over the next two years. Meanwhile, the workforce overall is expected to get maybe 2-5% over two years here. And I say that overall because I heavily doubt that existing workers will pass on this increase and instead will be predominantly through 'new hires'.


So most likely, we will be left with this inflation, and many of these prices will be baked in, and we will have to get used to that. Get used to the fact that a head of broccoli now costs the equivalent of 30 mins work, the fact that houses prices are higher than ever, and if you were not on the property ladder before covid, it is now highly unlikely that you will be able to get on now. That's life; that's how it goes. Nothing more to be done… or is there?


I would like to think there is more that can be done and that the answer lies in changing the way we think about things. If we want to be a country that is known for being stable, we need to change a lot about the way we think about and handle money. Wages should not be decreasing in real terms and people should not have to take on extra jobs just to make ends meet. This is not a third-world country, and we should not be having to make these kinds of decisions. Quality of life should not be based on how much extra money you can make. We should not be a country that is known for working long hours and being stressed all the time. This is not a sustainable way to live.


I think the answer, in part, lies in the way we think about money. We need to start valuing things that are not money. We need to start valuing our time and our wellbeing. We need to start thinking about the long term and not just the short term. We need to start saving for our future and not just for our next holiday. We need to start thinking about the things that will make us happy in life and not just the things that will make us


I am not an economist, and I do not claim to have all the answers. But I do know that the way we are currently living is not sustainable and that something needs to change.


What do you think needs to be done to change the way we think about money?


Are you comfortable with the way things are? Do you think that this is the new normal? Or do you think that we can and should do something about it?


Comment below and let me know your thoughts.


Is there possibly something that can be done about inflation, about property prices? Is there a way for us to ensure that younger generations don't get left behind in a mad dash to buy anything connected to a patch of dirt? Maybe there are perhaps proper resources for building affordable housing (in a way that doesn't ghettoise said houses); maybe there is a way to ensure that all wages rise evenly so that people can buy the same groceries that they purchased before. I wonder what kind of country we would be if that were to happen. Would there still be the same divisions?


But that's just my opinion, I could be wrong.


Would people still demonise groups of people purely based on their socio-economic basis?



I don't think it's likely that we will live to see this world, but I think it's worth it to try.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Some of the Most Influential Cases in US History

 Introduction The legal system is a fundamental aspect of any society, responsible for maintaining order and justice and protecting individual rights. Throughout history, many influential legal cases have shaped the legal system as we know it today. In this article, we will explore the most influential legal cases in history and their impact on the development of the legal system. Marbury v. Madison (1803) Marbury v. Madison is one of the most significant cases in American legal history. It established the principle of judicial review, which grants the Supreme Court the power to declare acts of Congress unconstitutional. The case arose when William Marbury sued Secretary of State James Madison for failing to deliver his commission as a justice of the peace. In 1801, President John Adams appointed a number of justices of the peace and judges for the District of Columbia. Before he left office, Adams signed the commissions, and they were sealed by the Secretary of State, John Marshall, w

Misappropriation of likeness, it's in the game

Misappropriation of likeness, it's in the game With the recent announcement that EA will be venturing back into the world of college sports for one of their upcoming games. It is essential to look at the reasons for its (over a decade-long) hiatus from making college sports games. Several high-profile cases took down a very profitable area of sports gaming almost ten years ago, over a simple but crucial element to the games, the players.  Privacy and personality laws in the United States is an emerging area of law founded on the basis that is based in tort law. It deals with the ideas that a person has rights: 1. To be left alone; 2. To not have public disclosure of private facts; 3. To not be depicted in a false light; and 4. To not have your name and likeness misappropriated.  On these critical tenets, personality laws have become increasingly more prevalent as, due to advances in technologies, it is becoming easier for one's likeness to be copied and distributed.  Th

What is a WIPO Trademark Search?

What is the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)?  The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is a United Nations agency that is concerned with safeguarding intellectual property (I.P.) across multiple nations through a global framework. They are a self-financing office of the United Nations, with 193 Member States. Their order, administering bodies and methodology are set out in the WIPO Convention, which set up WIPO in 1967.  WIPO fills in as a gathering for its Member States to build up and fit standards and practices for the insurance of licensed innovation rights. WIPO likewise benefits worldwide enrolment frameworks for brand names, mechanical plans and designations of the beginning, and a global recording framework for licenses.  These frameworks are under routine survey to decide how they can be improved better to serve the necessities of clients and expected clients. Many industrialized countries have licensed innovation insurance frameworks that are except