Skip to main content

What is a WIPO Trademark Search?

What is the World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO)? 

The World Intellectual Property Organization (WIPO) is a United Nations agency that is concerned with safeguarding intellectual property (I.P.) across multiple nations through a global framework. They are a self-financing office of the United Nations, with 193 Member States. Their order, administering bodies and methodology are set out in the WIPO Convention, which set up WIPO in 1967. 

WIPO fills in as a gathering for its Member States to build up and fit standards and practices for the insurance of licensed innovation rights. WIPO likewise benefits worldwide enrolment frameworks for brand names, mechanical plans and designations of the beginning, and a global recording framework for licenses. 

These frameworks are under routine survey to decide how they can be improved better to serve the necessities of clients and expected clients. Many industrialized countries have licensed innovation insurance frameworks that are exceptionally old. 

Worldwide Brand Database 

The information base contains about 13 million records, with 15 public and global assortments. The information base includes more than 4 million accessible pictures. 

Advantages of a Trademark Search 

The more you think about the advantages of a brand name search, the more you'll understand that you need it before utilizing an imprint name, logo or expression in trade. An inside and out brand name search investigation is energetically prescribed for deciding whether your proposed mark is accessible and away from likely clashes. There are a few essential advantages in a brand name search. 

Find Potential Conflicting Marks


Initial, a brand name search reveals to you whether somebody has just started to utilize an indistinguishable or comparative imprint. On the off chance that your proposed mark clashes with a current imprint, by conducting on a trademark search you are avoiding a potential damages claim. 

Set aside Time and Cash 

Besides, as referenced previously, a decent brand name search will save you time and cash. Over the long haul, it will assist you with avoiding going before comparatively confounding imprints. Plus, a complete brand name search will help you with staying away from lost showcasing and creation costs. For instance, assume you dispatch and print a huge number of dollars worth of commercials, item names or handouts to find later that you might be compelled to change your item name to keep away from encroachment with a comparative going before mark. Quick reserve funds can be seen when attempting to document a brand name application with the Patent and Trademark Office. A brand name search will uncover any enlisted or forthcoming imprints that are similar to your imprint. In this manner, on the off chance that you find that clashing imprints exist, at that point, you will spare yourself the brand name application expense by not documenting a similar name. The administration application charge is regularly non-refundable.

How to use WIPO

By going to the WIPO website or just clicking this link, you will be transported to search engine. 

You can either enter in the words or search by uploading an image to see if there are any similar marks. If there is, you should speak to your lawyer about the next steps. 


Popular posts from this blog

Green Eggs and Hamm

Green Eggs and Hamm

How a crotch shot of John Hamm and Dr Seuss have sparked the most intense debate on fair use dealing in copyright in the last ten years. 
In 2013, John Hamm was in full swing, sipping cocktails and filming the wildly successful Mad Men however in years to come he may be remembered for something much more different. One uneventful day, John Hamm was photographed going commando and, thus changed how we see intellectual property rights on the internet forever. 
Like all paparazzi photos, it was promptly uploaded to the internet and licenced for use. Unbeknownst to the photographer, the image was then used in an article by the Huffington Post, titled "25 Things You Wish You Hadn't Learned In 2013 And Must Forget In 2014." The writer of the piece turned the photo into a humourous GIF with the intention of mocking people who would want to see the picture and satirising the idea that it was news at all. 
The photographer later registered the photo's copyrig…

Woman Wins Copyright Case Against Adult Film Studio Who Recorded Videos In Her House.

A recent case in the United States District Court of Massachusetts has seen a woman whose house was used as a film set for adult videos without her knowledge be awarded damages… but not for what you think.
In Bassett v Jensen, Ms Bassett, the owner of the property, signed an agreement with a renter to lease her Martha's Vineyard property for seven months for the sole use of Mr Spafford and his family. Spafford had moved to Martha's Vineyard to work as a photographer and cameraman for an adult film director. Throughout the lease, Ms Bassett claims that 21 different videos were filmed at her property. Following the end of the Lease, Ms Bassett had to stop renting out the property as there was significant damage caused to the building and later due to the publicity that the property was used in filming the videos.
Ms Bassett then argued that not only did the video showcase her property but they had infringed her copyright on numerous of her self-made artworks which were hanging in…

NEVER Read the Comments!

The Federal Court this week delivered their judgement on Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Service Seeking Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1040 going all out by handing out whopping fines, legal costs orders and ordering Service Seeking Pty Ltd to establish a, undoubtedly expensive, compliance system to be monitored by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). 
What did they do that was so bad? According to the Federal Court of Australia, they created a system in which businesses could write their own customer reviews. With a rating system less defined than what constitutes a 5-star rating in an Uber trip, businesses could write a review, assign a star rating and send it off to their customer for approval. If the customer didn’t respond or even open the email containing the review, then the review was automatically published online after a set period. By estimates of the Court, approximately 80% of the reviews published on the website for the period that this scheme …