Skip to main content

What Do Copyright and Trademark Symbols Mean?

What Do Copyright and Trademark Symbols Mean?


You may have seen the circle "C" copyright symbol on artist copyright symbol appearing in works such as TV shows, websites and books. This symbol, the letter 'c' with a circle around, encapsulates the principles of intellectual property law and how you are protected by using it. 


But what is the copyright symbol?


A copyright symbol, which is also referred to as a copyright notice in the USA, is an identifying symbol that informs the public that someone has ownership over that particular work. 


The symbol came into everyday use by the 1952 Universal Copyright Convention which states that, along with the ©, a copyright notice must contain the name of the owner and the year the original work was published or produced. 


In the USA, since March 1, 1989, the Copyright Act removed the requirement for copyright notices. Which meant that creators of materials do not have to put a copyright sign or notice on their work because they are protected by copyright law. Yet, some creators still put the copyright mark or copyright notice even if their works have been recent to further safeguard their legal rights and as a deterrent against potential thieves.


How Copyright Works



Copyright gives someone the exclusive right to distribute artistic work for a certain amount of time. 


According to the Copyright Act of 1976, the owner of a copyright is granted six exclusive rights to deal with the copyright works:


  • To reproduce the work;
  • To distribute the work;
  • To create derivative works;
  • To publicly perform the work;
  • To publicly display the work; and
  • To publicly perform sound recordings utilising digital audio transmission.


Copyright and Trademark Symbols



To recap the copyright symbol is applicable from the moment an eligible work is created (©), unlike trademarks, whereas there are different rights depending on the status of the trademark, there is a symbol for registered trademarks (®) and a logo for unregistered trademarks (™).


To qualify for the use of the registered trademark symbol (®), you must register your trademark with the appropriate authority in your country. In contrast, the trademark symbol (™) can be applied to any logo you are using as a trademark. 


You can place the copyright symbol on any original piece of work you have created. While it has generally been a requirement in some jurisdictions to include a copyright notice on work to be able to claim copyright over it, it is not legally required but failing to do so can affect the damages you may be able to claim if anyone infringes your copyright.


Copyright Infringement and the Law



The unauthorised use of copyrighted work can lead to lawsuits. Certain exceptions allow the limited use of a copyrighted work for study, criticism and other purposes. These rules are collectively known as "fair use" rules and are one of the only defences to a copyright infringement claim.


Copyright Notices



As discussed before copyright notices will often state the owner of the copyright and the year the work was created. Copyright Notices can be useful for copyright owners who may wish to license their work, thereby letting others use it, potentially for a fee. 



TM symbol



Trademarks, use similar symbols when noting the intellectual property such as the registered trademark symbol, which is a capital "R" in a circle. That indicates the trademark has been registered with the relevant authority in that country. Some may be labelled with the trademark symbol "TM," which generally means the trademark is not yet registered.


Patent



Patented inventions are often labelled with their patent number, which is a unique serial number assigned when a patent is granted by the relevant authority. If a patent has been applied for but hasn't been granted yet, the patent is usually accompanied with the phrase "patent pending." Anyone found to be using a patented invention without permission of the owner can also face legal penalties. 


Consult a lawyer for advice on intellectual property and how it affects you if you need to do so.


Comments

Popular posts from this blog

Green Eggs and Hamm

Green Eggs and Hamm

How a crotch shot of John Hamm and Dr Seuss have sparked the most intense debate on fair use dealing in copyright in the last ten years. 
In 2013, John Hamm was in full swing, sipping cocktails and filming the wildly successful Mad Men however in years to come he may be remembered for something much more different. One uneventful day, John Hamm was photographed going commando and, thus changed how we see intellectual property rights on the internet forever. 
Like all paparazzi photos, it was promptly uploaded to the internet and licenced for use. Unbeknownst to the photographer, the image was then used in an article by the Huffington Post, titled "25 Things You Wish You Hadn't Learned In 2013 And Must Forget In 2014." The writer of the piece turned the photo into a humourous GIF with the intention of mocking people who would want to see the picture and satirising the idea that it was news at all. 
The photographer later registered the photo's copyrig…

Woman Wins Copyright Case Against Adult Film Studio Who Recorded Videos In Her House.

A recent case in the United States District Court of Massachusetts has seen a woman whose house was used as a film set for adult videos without her knowledge be awarded damages… but not for what you think.
In Bassett v Jensen, Ms Bassett, the owner of the property, signed an agreement with a renter to lease her Martha's Vineyard property for seven months for the sole use of Mr Spafford and his family. Spafford had moved to Martha's Vineyard to work as a photographer and cameraman for an adult film director. Throughout the lease, Ms Bassett claims that 21 different videos were filmed at her property. Following the end of the Lease, Ms Bassett had to stop renting out the property as there was significant damage caused to the building and later due to the publicity that the property was used in filming the videos.
Ms Bassett then argued that not only did the video showcase her property but they had infringed her copyright on numerous of her self-made artworks which were hanging in…

NEVER Read the Comments!

The Federal Court this week delivered their judgement on Australian Competition and Consumer Commission v Service Seeking Pty Ltd [2020] FCA 1040 going all out by handing out whopping fines, legal costs orders and ordering Service Seeking Pty Ltd to establish a, undoubtedly expensive, compliance system to be monitored by the Australian Competition and Consumer Commission (ACCC). 
What did they do that was so bad? According to the Federal Court of Australia, they created a system in which businesses could write their own customer reviews. With a rating system less defined than what constitutes a 5-star rating in an Uber trip, businesses could write a review, assign a star rating and send it off to their customer for approval. If the customer didn’t respond or even open the email containing the review, then the review was automatically published online after a set period. By estimates of the Court, approximately 80% of the reviews published on the website for the period that this scheme …